Politics
- April 6, 2008
IndChin
China today, lifted the ban from Wikipedia, isn’t that a wonderful thing? India, on the other hand has forced some ‘uber-cool’ cybercafe’s to ban Orkut, a social networking site. Which site is more dangerous? If you ask me Wikipedia is, why isn’t India banning Wikipedia?! I mean, isn’t Mumbai the next Shanghai? And aren’t we really heading towards dictatorship?
An author cannot even publish a book without starting riots between communities these days, an artist cannot even paint his work according to his will, a journalist can’t even write something against the ’system’ or else ‘people’ vandalize property of the company for which he works. A movie can’t be released, even though the movie is based on ‘fiction’ in some states of the country, a blogger can’t even use his free speech right, because it may hurt the sentiments of the government, oh wait sorry, the people.
The image that India is trying to show of its shining and immerging as the future super power, is being affected by such petty things, I mean don’t you think people laugh when they see this? Its a different thing for China, because it has proclaimed that its a country which is not democratic in nature, why are we waiting? Most of the people in India who vote/live don’t even know the meaning of democracy, if they did; our nation wouldn’t be in such a state, that I am sure of.
Let’s just go ahead and proclaim some ‘cute’ person a dictator of our country, because heck ‘we the people’ love those cute and hot politicians. And then let us not educate the people and sign a pact with China of co-operation, and hand in hand with China, we will too become a country where people work for 22 hours a day for some opium in a sweatshop.
By the way, IndChin is short for India & China, like MicroApple for Microsoft & Apple :)
No related posts
11 Responses to “IndChin”
It’s incorrect to be politically correct.
If only people realized that.
By AnarchoAtheist on Apr 6, 2008
Indeed it is.
And trust me its not that simple to realize that XD
By The Drunk Santa on Apr 6, 2008
Realization is easy, just the implementation is tough :) Thats the reason why most people choose to be politically incorrect anyway, cos its easier that way.
By shailja on Apr 7, 2008
Thats the reason why most people choose to be politically incorrect anyway, cos its easier that way.
You can never be politically correct anyway, because what is ‘politically’ correct according to you, might be ‘politically’ incorrect according to some other person.
By Jayesh Bhagchandani on Apr 7, 2008
Thats cos they are politically incorrect :P Not me!
By shailja on Apr 7, 2008
I am confused for the first time in my life, damn’ you woman!
By The Drunk Santa on Apr 7, 2008
xD hawww you!
By shailja on Apr 8, 2008
Oh bah.
By The Drunk Santa on Apr 8, 2008
Aha, yes I know. And that kills the entire point of political correctness. In the end it’s offending me if not some other ‘minority’ or socio-ethnic or religious or whatever group.
And it’s easier to be politically incorrect, yes, but then you get the price of not dealing with a guilty conscience! ^^
[i]Realization is easy, just the implementation is tough :) Thats the reason why most people choose to be politically incorrect anyway, cos its easier that way.[/i]
Did I not get something there? The implementation is though and then most people chose to be politically incorrect ’cause it’s easier?
By AnarchoAtheist on Apr 10, 2008
Screw Wordpress. I forgot I need to tag in HTML instead of BB. Dude, I am too lazy, you do the needful. :|
By AnarchoAtheist on Apr 10, 2008
And it’s easier to be politically incorrect, yes, but then you get the price of not dealing with a guilty conscience! ^^
Quite true.
Screw Wordpress. I forgot I need to tag in HTML instead of BB. Dude, I am too lazy, you do the needful. :|
Tag?! Do the needful?! :| :|
By The Drunk Santa on Apr 10, 2008