Big Religion

Statutory Warning:

This post may contain a lot of religiously offensive material. Well, if you think about it, not really, but there’ll always be the boneheaded. And since we love our audience so much..

Okay, so I went to see Akshardham (Delhi) today. For those of you who don’t know what that is:

“BAPS Swaminarayan Akshardham in New Delhi, India, is the world’s largest comprehensive Hindu temple. It measures 356 ft. long, 316 ft. wide and 141 ft. high, covering an area of 86,342 sq. ft. The grand, ancient-style, ornately hand-carved stone temple has been built without structural steel within five years by 11,000 artisans and volunteers. His Holiness Pramukh Swami Maharaj, revered spiritual leader of BAPS, consecrated the temple on 6 November 2005.”

It has its name now in the Guinness Book of World Records too.

Yay for us?

On a personal level, I felt more disturbed than awed by the sight. See what bothers me here is, this is vaguely reminiscent of the times when all progress was chucked out the window and buildings, magnificent ones, were built left right and center. This was the time when dear old Mughal and co. were in the driving seat. The rich were filthy rich and the poor were dying. Enter the British.

When the poor were dying and illiteracy was rampant, when there are regions in this country where art forms along with artisans are dying, when children young and old are sold off and ruthlessly disabled to be used as beggars, when we won’t talk about sex in our houses while we have a huge and an un-talked problem of forced incest and when issues like child education, child labor and diseases like AIDS are mostly ignored; what we need is a huge mandir. Sure. We already went ahead and demolished the Babri Masjid, killing off countless people in the process. Lets have another huge mandir, the Raam Janambhoomi mandir. That’ll help India shine. Oh and while we’re at it lets throw in a few Peace memorials and random parks (which serve no real purpose since they are no where near residential areas) for fun. Yes, what we need is more pointless structures, more money and time being wasted behind parliamentary discussions on “Is the name Bombay Scottish ruining our culture”, more commonwealth “villages” that’ll show how super fu**ing advanced India is and some more random boneheads, who just can’t comprehend what “cosmopolitan” means breaking things and making good people lose money.

Anyway, the coolest part of Akshardham is, its a temple, sure, but its also a mall and an amusement park at the same time; an amusement temple if you will. An IMAX, boat rides, light and sound and an air conditioned food court. It is amazing how God has so subtly been converted into a business plan.

Oh did I hear someone say “Teach children values and culture?” and “If thats what holds their interest why not?”. Why don’t we just package candy with a picture of God on top and a “did you know” underneath? That’d do the job pretty too. And we’ll make a killing on profits too. But no, that is where we cross the line. We can murder in the name of God, we can occupy any land we want (which might belong to some good man who has invested his life’s savings in it) and keep a few random stones and call it a temple, we can damage public property, we can dupe foreigners hell we can purchase some kid, teach him some random “shlokas” and put the bugger on the job. But candy wrappers? Really? Is Santa drunk today?

Moral of the story, culture and the heritage comes first. We are a nation of a billion (minus some) blind people who just refuse to see the past screaming “I’m friggin history, don’t repeat me!”.

And we’re a big country, the homeless will find some railway track to live beside anyway.


The Amarnath Land-Row: ExplainedSkywalker - The flyover for “humans”
  1. 19 Responses to “Big Religion”

  2. Hello there. I was sent a link to your blog by a friend a while ago. I have been reading a long for a while now. Just wanted to say HI. Thanks for putting in all the hard work.

    Jennifer Lancey

    By Jennifer Lancey on May 16, 2008

  3. This is interesting…Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia, has some interesting information on the mughals that contradict many of the things mentioned here.

    By Krishna on May 17, 2008

  4. @Krishna: Could you mention the exact page you’re referring to? And admittedly, I took a bit of liberty when I said Mughal and co. I’m talking about the post Shahjahan rulers in specific.

    Also, the post doesn’t comment on the religious tolerance shown by the Mughals, but its more about the way science and the poor were ignored while monuments were built here there and everywhere. :)

    By Sumit on May 17, 2008

  5. Nice post. You write really well. :)

    By Tamanna on May 17, 2008

  6. @Tamanna: thanks :)

    By Sumit on May 17, 2008

  7. Quoting Veronica here “I’m lovin it” XD

    And bc, I am surpised to see you write stuff like this, good work though :)

    By Jayesh on May 17, 2008

  8. @Jennifer : We appreciate you putting in a comment :)

    By Jayesh on May 17, 2008

  9. Well, since this is the first thing I’ve read coming from you. You did a fuckin’ good job.

    Culture. Pfft. The pristine Indian culture comprising of pristine Indian men. Who can’t stop staring at the “assets” of any woman. Wait, that’s the Western culture, no? XD

    People aren’t really blind. They’re just scared. Quoting H. P. Lovecraft here.

    “The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents… some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new Dark Age.”

    By Falak Mulchandani on May 18, 2008

  10. Oh. And Sumit bhai, I am a guy. XD

    [Jay told me you mistook me for a girl. XD]

    By Falak Mulchandani on May 18, 2008

  11. Yes Yes. My bad xD

    Actually it went sort of like this in my mind: Falak => Palak (Eyelash wala) == Girl :S

    Sorry tho :)

    By Sumit on May 19, 2008

  12. Ah, yeah. Many people do that. They don’t realize it’s not a Hindu word itself. :P

    It’s a Urdu word. Surprisingly, it’s used in Arabic and Marathi too.

    Urdu and Arabic. How ironic. :|

    By Falak Mulchandani on May 19, 2008

  13. WHAT THE FUCK YOU’RE IN DELHI AND YOU DIN’T TELL ME? :|

    By shailja on May 22, 2008

  14. errm?

    I presume “You” refers to Jaess here. And it was I who was in Del, not he :)

    I guess that settles things?

    By Sumit on May 22, 2008

  15. Oh Oops. I thought this was by Jay.
    :$ just read the author name. Delete the comment if you can :)

    Did you go for the boat ride then? Makes you really proud of ancient Indians. Quite alota achievements in all fields don’t you think? The temple is pretty impressive & commercial.. Hate the way they strip all the leather of you & make you spit the gum etc before you enter.
    But religion, spirituality etc are a major upcoming industries nowadays.. Ram Dev, Sri Sri Ravishankar (I mean, wtf, repeating sri makes you more learned or something? people with a double P.hd don’t write Dr.Dr. xyz now do they they?) & meditation spas & ashrams are making people billionaires in the much criticized USA

    lol get rich anyway.

    Oh & Falaq im quite fascinated by your name & have a um, not quite so friendly acquaintance of the same name, what does your name mean?

    By shailja on May 22, 2008

  16. *industry. Gawd im sleepy.

    By shailja on May 22, 2008

  17. Its Falak :| And it means sky and oh I am not Falak XD

    By Jayesh on May 24, 2008

  18. Here is the article I referred to on the Moguls/Akbar

    By Krishna on May 30, 2008

  19. @Krishna: Yes, that is what I meant when I said post Shahjahan rulers in my comment. :)

    By Sumit on May 30, 2008

  20. The reason i liked this post is because it gave me a new direction to think in.. I have visited Akshardham, Gandhinagar too & frankly speaking I was totally awed by it..

    But not even once have I thought on lines similar to what Sumit has written here….

    I’m not that much into relegion and over the years i’ve learned not to meddle with people who are too much into it.

    I’ve heard few arguments which contradict what Sumit has written here and I wont be able to pick one of the sides and hold on to it because I dont want to.

    But I’d anyday prefer paying the school fee of a child rather than donating money to a temple and having my name engraved in stone.

    By Harsh Dhulia on Jul 15, 2008

Post a Comment